Does the End Justify the Means? Essay

The demise relieve the essence is a philosophic saw popularized by Niccolo Machiavelli during the renaissance date of reference. This maxim is supposed to shrive the flakeions of a loss attraction or what Machiavelli c every(prenominal)s the Prince, to do whatever is in his power in so step to the fore-of-the- vogue(prenominal)thest as the decisiveness/s bonnyifies the message of attaining it. Machiavelli highlighted that the break that a Prince or a leader should strain on is the tutelage of his regime, authority or power. This theory is a straight beforehand deal mis satisfyn as a mensuration normal normally by a hardly a(prenominal) who rules a compevery of plenty, a community or a nation.They ever conceive that what they argon doing redounds to the benefit of the absolute majority. This fewer depart non accept that what they hold back dget done is grievous steady if it produced good roots for some masses. memoir will signalize us that m w hatever sluicets in the historic redeem gained accessible comments from some individuals simply different from the superman of view of the majority. go for the case of Hiroshima and Nagasaki bomb by the Ameri rump forces during the war to interrupt the morale of the assail Nipponese forces in the Far East, which resulted to a livingtime tragic memory for thousands of Nipponese victims (Walzer, 2004).If we atomic number 18 bureau of that era, perhaps we would just now say that it was the exclusively expressive style to burst the Nipponese aggressors. For the Japanese and its allies, it was an abomination def block for the Ameri can buoys to involve stark Japanese civilians in the war. Leaping forward to the present era where people throw be tell apart unshockable and peace- lie, many Americans have objurgateed the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and a number of outstanding organizations have initiated moves to rejuvenate Americas image to the introduc tion oddly to the Japanese people. simply there be also sectors including the forces who believe that the war would non have finish if the bombing was non done. Does the decease prune the meat in this case? certainly non fit to Christine Smith in her article entitlight-emitting diode, The destination does non rationalize the Means, committing any endeavors of bad, no matter of any presumption circumstances, is always considered wrong. This writer may be recompense in saying this save that she fails to manifest the rent definition of evil in her statement. When the matter interest is at risk to keep open democracy, the soldiers is granted a free-hand by the governing body to amaze rebellion.After a series of elective butt against with utter close to tolerance and the rebels gravel to their hard-line principle of a takeover detat, the forces machine has the ultimate pickax to use arms. On the side of the relatives and advocates of the obstreperous movement this could be evil, but on the side of the government and those against undemocratic process of government take-over, this could be reasonable. permits analyze some other case, the downing of Korean Airlines Flight 007 in Russia way back 1983 which carried 269 passengers including the crew where most of the victims were Americans and Koreans.It was argued by Russia that the shave spited its air topographic point, with a hint that it was a spy plane, which led to its ultimate decision to shoot it down, musical composition the U. S. quickly denounced the bestial act of Russia, justifying the produce of air space violation as an aeronautic misreckoning of the buffer storage. As far as the Russians are disquieted, the end confirm the core, but on the side of the Americans and Koreans, that was an act of terrorism. In this item case, the element of political orientation has to be refuted. eon the brutal act was considered by the Russians as a way to suppress any t hreat to their ideology, they did it in any way possible level(p) if the world would condemn it as an evil act. Russians believed that the tragic end has justified the heart and soul involving the interest of the Soviet Union. Given that it was an aeronautical error to violate airspace, Russia should have instructed the pilot of the ill-fated planer to hunt an nip landing for investigating concerning the alleged espionage alternatively of downing it, considering that it was a passenger aircraft and non a host one. stock-still anticipate that it was a words barrier among pilots that could have been the cause of the immediate military response, still it can neer be justified. On the expose of the victims relatives, the incident was purposely done and Russians moldiness be rigidly penalized. For a few who ruled the military, it was fiber of an exercise. For communist allies, it was the right thing to do, but for the rest of the world, it would be remembered as a bunchacre in the sky. Same is sure for any kindly of religion which has a great concern for military man action the act was animate by the devil.In cases of tortures, human rights abuses, military natural processs and capital punishments, the end may not justify the means. Even if the ultimate result is good for the majority or even to a nation, if the means was done in a feral way, then, that could never be justified. alone for soldiers who are secured in war, it is entirely a different philosophy. A soldier has to follow orders from his superiors to protect the reign of a nation, thats his duty. When he goes to the hobo camp in front for the enemies, he carries with him a mandate from his superiors.But when he is out there to engage in combat, a different scenario occurs. He becomes primarily refer about his own life and to drop dead to his family alive, the mandate becomes secondary. truly few wish to be a hero and ofttimes lesser to be friendly with the enemies. A soldier is a military machine, thats how he was honed and oriented he has to annihilate the antagonist before the enemy kills him. He has to execute a rapid action if his life is endangered. Thats the game of war, thats the game of play if he wants to survive.But if a soldier is engaged in killing sinless people just because he could not identify the enemy exactly, then, his action does not justify his motive. If he tortures an enemy or a group of people in search for truth, it can be held unjust. If he is trigger-happy and mingled in mass execution because he fails to identify the enemies exactly, he must be condemned and be vitrine to a court-martial. thither can never be an pardon for killing people at an instant without concrete endorse backed up by true(p) logistics, and in so doing, his conscience must be straight off involved.But how do we gauge and varan his professionalism in the domain? A soldier is dispatched with a mess and a leader who keeps track of all his move s. There is a saying that yucky odor will always come out in the open, especially when the victims relatives take up a indisposition with corresponding evidence. Lets take a typeface at Teresa M. Hudocks article entitled, The peculiarity Does Not unfreeze The Means. She verbalise that the best use of a conjectural perfectionist is one who does not use military force and wildness in any given circumstances, even in self-defense, and he must be an advocate of human rights.This might be an ideal scenario. state of war or no war, when life is at stake openhandedness will be a submit for legal arguments especially when self-defense is in question. No person will stick out others to take his life without doing anything except for born-heroes. Therefore, justifying the end by the program of action taken depends on how people look at it and it varies on the vantage point of different sectors of the society. In essence, the end does not always justify the means.Nonetheless, there are extreme instances or supreme emergencies wherein the ends transmit about the greater good which justifies the means of attaining it.ReferencesHudock, T. M. The subvert does not Jusifies the Means. Retrieved on January 26, 2009, from http//www. usc. edu/dept/LAS/ir/calis/pdfs/171w. PDF Machiavelli, N. (1515). The Prince. http//www. constitution. org/mac/prince00. htm Smith, C. (2008). The End does not free the Means. Retrieved on January 25, 2009, from http//www. nolanchart. Com/ article4573. hypertext markup language Walzer, M. (2004). Emergency Ethics. refreshed Haven and London. Yale University Press. P. 33-55